RMF Lifecycle & ATO Support
We handle categorization, control implementation, package development, and the push through assessment and authorization.
System Categorization · Control Implementation · Assessment & Authorization
Glacier Byte joins defense programs to lead the authorization package, support the assessment, and maintain the work after the ATO. We can take the full lifecycle or a defined workstream.
Discuss the programA program may need one owner from categorization through monitoring. It may need a narrower scope: repairing a package, preparing for assessment, or owning sustainment after authorization.
We handle categorization, control implementation, package development, and the push through assessment and authorization.
System Categorization · Control Implementation · Assessment & Authorization
We maintain the POA&M, evidence, monitoring reports, and reauthorization work that keep the ATO current.
POA&M Management · ConMon Reporting · Reauthorization Support
System Security Plans, POA&Ms, policies, and evidence written for the people who implement and assess them.
System Security Plans · Policy Development · Evidence Collection
Assessments against your NIST 800-53 baseline, with findings tied to owners, remediation steps, and due dates.
Control Validation · Vulnerability Assessments · Audit Preparation
We apply and document STIG and SRG settings, resolve scan findings, and maintain the hardened configuration as the system changes.
STIG Compliance · Vulnerability Management · Security Automation
We deploy and configure Splunk or the Elastic Stack inside disconnected environments, from log onboarding and detection content through hardening and operational handoff.
SIEM Architecture & Sizing · Log Onboarding & Detection · Hardening & Operational Handoff
We bring AI and new system components into the program boundary, then handle integration, hardening, evidence, and authorization under the existing RMF process.
Secure System Integration · AI Risk & Authorization · NIST AI RMF Alignment
What program teams usually ask before bringing us into the work.
Yes. We review the boundary, baseline, package, open findings, and assessment history, then identify the work that needs an owner. A program does not need to restart the RMF process to bring us in.
No. We can lead the full lifecycle or take a defined scope such as package development, assessment support, POA&M management, hardening, or continuous monitoring.
Deliverables depend on scope, but commonly include the SSP, control implementation narratives, evidence records, POA&Ms, assessment responses, policies, hardening records, and continuous monitoring reports.
Yes. We prepare and maintain control responses, artifacts, findings, and authorization records for review in eMASS, following the customer’s access and approval process.
We work inside the program with engineering, security, delivery, and leadership. The people attending working sessions are the same people responsible for the package and follow-up actions.
Yes. We maintain evidence, track POA&Ms, support scanning and remediation, document system changes, prepare continuous monitoring reports, and support reauthorization.
We start with the system boundary, control baseline, current package status, known findings, assessor feedback, target deadline, and the outcome the program needs next.
We will review the current state, identify the first decision or gap holding up the work, and define a practical scope with your team.
Talk with an RMF lead